|
Chapter 29
Global Environmental Change
| Required Reading |
Additional
Reading (2-3 Quiz questions from these sources) |
|
|
|
Links for Enrichment and Further Learning
Student Learning Outcomes. Lessons in this
chapter are intended to help students to:
- Recognize that the so-called "controversy" about global warming
primarily is a journalistic controversy and a political controversy
-- not a scientific controversy.
- Grasp the immense scope of scientific efforts to predict global
climate change.
- Recognize that characterizations of long-term trends achieve
greater reliability as the number of observations increases.
- Explain the greenhouse effect in terms of electromagnetic
radiation and atmospheric gases.
- Distinguish between "greenhouse effect" and "global warming."
- Intellectually perceive the possible connections between
increases in global temperature and increases in atmospheric CO2.
- Describe the few, main logical components of climate modeling.
- Preview the possible impacts of global warming on the Earth's
environments and on civilization.
Study Questions / Quiz Prep. (Consult Required Reading and lecture notes for answers.)
- There are many ways to take a planet's temperature. Describe three of
those ways.
- In taking the planet's temperature, what interesting
observation have scientists made?
- Starting in 1958 in Mauna Loa, atmospheric CO2 has
been systematically measured and recorded. Yet scientists have plotted
atmospheric CO2 for the last 300 years. How do scientists do this?
- What interesting observation have scientists made about the amount of
atmospheric CO2 over the last few centuries?
-
What is the greenhouse effect? How does it work?
- What has been the percentage increase of
atmospheric CO2 between the year 1800 and the year 2000? HINT: Derive values
from Figure 29.2 and calculate the answer yourself.
- Make a general statement that describes how plants respond when exposed
to increased atmospheric CO2.
- In studying the effects of increased CO2 on
a tallgrass prairie ecosystem in Kansas, C.E. Owensby plants grew larger
during years of average or below-average rainfall. Explain.
- What are the main greenhouse gases? For each gas,
which human activities add them to the atmosphere?
- What are GCMs?
- How do scientists develop general circulation
models? Do they guard their secret code from other scientists, or do they
share their code?
- Is there only one authoritative general circulation
model? If not, how many models are in use today?
- How do general circulation models represent the
Earth?
- What is the ultimate aim of general circulation
model development?
- Study the results of the CSIRO-Mk2 that depicts a
CO2-doubled world (below). Compare warming between the
tropics and high latitudes in the northern hemisphere.

- Consider the comparison of general circulation
models from different labs (Figure 29.11). Although the models predict
slightly different climate futures, what do they all indicate?
- Refer to the “Annual Temperature Change Difference”
simulation results for a CO2 doubled world by the General Fluid Dynamics
laboratory (GFDL) pictured in Figure 29.12(a). According to this model,
which three states will experience the greatest increases in annual
temperature? Which five states will experience the smallest increase in
annual temperature?
- Refer to the “Annual Precipitation Change Ratio”
simulation results for a CO2 doubled world by the General Fluid Dynamics
laboratory (GFDL) pictured in Figure 29.12(b). According to this model, will
the northeastern United States be wetter or drier? Will the southwestern
United States be wetter or drier?
- What is the major source of soot and
sulfate particles? Where are the greatest concentrations of soot and sulfate
particles on the planet?
- Regard the United Kingdom Meteorological Office general circulation
model (UKMO GCM) results presented in Figure 29.13(a). How do sulfate
particles in the atmosphere influence global temperature?
- Important findings were reported in Jim Hansen's (et al.) paper of April
2005, Earth's Energy Imbalance: Confirmation and Implications. How did this
work increase the level of confidence about his model's accuracy?
- If the oceans are taking in more heat today, why won't that heat fully
influence global climate until 100+ years in the future?
- How might global warming transform the distribution of ecosystems?
- How might global warming threaten and destroy coastal environments?
- How might global warming disrupt current patterns of food production?
- How might global warming influence the distribution of warm-weather
diseases?
- Your friend lives in Fargo, North Dakota. She says that the winters have
been getting colder, not warmer. Wouldn't that mean that all this talk about
global warming is nothing but a bunch of liberal propaganda?
- A famous novelist disagrees with thousands of trained and experienced
scientists on the possible onset of global warming. The novelist writes good
fiction. Shouldn't you believe him when he says that global warming is a
hoax?
- The president of an international oil company presents carefully
prepared studies that show the Earth isn't warming at all, but cooling
instead. What do you think?
- A noted climate scientist presents a paper arguing that his climate
model of the previous year had several coding errors. What does this tell
you about the reliability of climate models?
- Britney Spears gives a concert in Alaska to raise awareness of the
effects of global warming on Polar Bears. Are you ready to sign on now?
- A salesguy calls you offering soon-to-be-coastal property in San
Bernardino, thanks to global warming. Buy now before everybody else
discovers this secret. Or should you?
Dealmakers sometimes can't deal with unwelcome scientific findings
 |
| Environmental issues are always party spoilers for
deal makers. |
Taking a planet's temperature
Direct measurements from land and sea indicate a warming trend
 |
| Direct temperature measurements using thermometers
from land and sea locations. Trend is upward when compared to 1800s and
early 1900s. |
Global temperatures using satellites
 |
| Combined temperature measurements from Microwave Sounding
Units aboard several NOAA satellites. |
Glaciers in retreat indicate a warming planet
 |
| This image indicates changes in glacier thickness since the
year, 1970. Note that the colors yellow, gold and brown
represent glaciers that are getting thinner. The overwhelming
majority of glaciers are getting thinner. Scientists attribute
this thinning as a consequence of a warming planet. |
 |
| An example of recent glacier retreat between the years 1985
and 2003. Easton Glacier on Mount Baker, Cascades, Washington. |
Discovering long-term trends in atmospheric CO2
Ancient Air is trapped in the ice. Scientists drill for it.

 |
| Scientists dig in the ice for clues about the
chemical composition of ancient atmospheres. Tiny bubbles in Antarctic
ice store remnants of ancient atmospheres. Scientists extract ice cores,
determine their age, then crush them in a vacuum. Liberated air from
bubbles is sampled for gas composition. |
 |
| Bubbles in a section of ice from an ice core. The bubbles
are filled with air from an ancient atmosphere. Scientists crush
the ice in a vacuum. The freed air is analyzed for the ancient
mix of atmospheric gases. |
 |
| National Ice Core Laboratory, University of Nevada,
Reno. |
Scientists use ice records to discover historical CO2 levels in
the atmosphere
 |
| Global CO2 concentrations over the last 300 years.
Blue dots represent direct instrument measurements. Gold dots represent
values determined from Antarctic ice cores. |
Is there a connection between increasing global temperature and increases in
atmospheric CO2?
The Greenhouse Effect: CO2 and other gases act to trap infrared
radiation -- warming the planet
 |
| Earth's surfaces, warmed by absorbing incoming sunlight,
re-radiate energy toward space in the form of infrared
radiation. Some gases like CO2, methane, chlorofluorocarbons
(CFCs) and nitrous oxide trap outbound infrared causing the
planet to retain more heat. |
General Circulation Models
The steps that scientists must take in order to understand and model the global climate system
1. Characterize the system. That is, be able to describe objective components of the system like temperature, atmospheric pressure, wind speed, wind direction, cloudiness and the like. The global network of weather stations, oceanographic sampling and satellites provide the data for this task.
2. Understand the physics of the system. Based on this comprehensive characterization of the global climate system, learn to understand the physics of the system. For example, explain the physics of cloud formation, or the physics of the greenhouse effect, or the physics of hurricane formation and oceanic heat transport. Explain how and why individual components of the system work.
3. Develop a conceptual model of the climate system. Based on an understanding of the physics of the components that make up the system, develop a conceptual model that shows how all of the components spontaneously interact to produce our global climate (General Circulation Model).
4. Write computer programs to represent the General Circulation Model (FORTRAN). That is, represent the model mathematically, and write computer programs that deal with the matematics in a sensible and efficient manner.
5. Design and build supercomputers. Dedicate these computers for the purpose of running the programs representing the General Circulation Model.
6. Run General Circulation Model programs and evaluate results. Calibrate models by predicting the past and the present. Then attempt to predict the future.
Scientists characterize the system by launching hundreds of weather balloons everyday and by constantly monitoring the weather with satellites.
 |
| Launching a weather balloon at sea. |
 |
| GOES-N weather satellite |
Scientists develop conceptual models of the global climate -- GCMs
 |
| Flow diagram for a 6-box climate model. This zonal energy
balance model, although apparently complex, has been superceded
by the more sophisticated and more complex General Circulation
Models of today. |
 |
| Cartesian grid approach to modeling the atmosphere.
Computations are performed on each box which in turn influence
the properties of adjacent boxes. New generation, spectral GCMs
achieve more realistic, fluid interactions by applying wave
properties to large groups of boxes. |
Scientists use computer programs to organize the thousands of
components in their climate simulation models
 |
| This is a tiny section of a large computer program used for
climate simulation at the Goddard institute for Space Studies.
The computer program is a quantitative representation of their
conceptual model for the operation of the global climate. The
language is the old FORTRAN. |
Scientists run their General Circulation Models on the world's fastest super
computers
 |
| IBM's Blue Gene/L supercomputer capable of performing 280
million million floating point operations per second (FLOPS). By
comparison, mainstream desktop computers perform about 10,000
FLOPS. In other words, this supercomputer is 28 billion times
faster than your sexy gamer's box. |
Scientists from many different laboratories around the world
cooperate/compete with each other to develop the most useful General
Circulation Model
 |
| Comparison of results from several different general
circulation models from different laboratories. Despite differences, all
predict a warming planet. CGCM1 - Coupled Global Climate Model
- Canadian Centre for Climate Modeling and Analysis, Victoria British
Colummbia.
CCSR - Center for Climate System Research, Tokyo, Japan.
CSIRO - Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation,
Australia.
ECHAM3 - Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg Germany.
GFDL_R15 - General Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ.
HadCM2 - Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, Exeter,
England.
DOE PCM - Parallel Climate Model - National Center for Atmospheric
research, Boulder, CO. |
How reliable are computer models?
A recent report (April 2005) makes the convincing argument that the Earth
is absorbing more heat than it is giving off.
 |
Dr. James E. Hansen, director of the NASA Goddard
Institute for Space Studies in Manhattan. His recent investigation makes it harder to doubt that the planet is
getting warmer and that humans are responsible. |
 |
| Validating the model by predicting the past. The Global Climate Model (NASA Goddard Institute for
Space Studies) predictions closely match actual observations of oceanic
heat content. Warming oceans persuasively indicate a warming planet.
Models (such as this one) that closely match empirical observations can
be used with greater confidence to predict the future climate.
From Earth's
energy imbalance: Confirmation and implications. |
 |
| Validating the model by predicting the past. These maps show observed (top) and modeled (bottom)
energy imbalances in the top 750 meters (2,461 feet) of the world's
oceans from 1993-2003. Areas where there was an energy surplus are shown
in shades of yellow to red, while areas where there was an energy
deficit are in shades of green to purple. Taken from web page at Earth's Energy Out of Balance |
So, what's the problem?
Heat absorbed by the oceans today might not exert its fullest impact on
climate change for hundreds of years
 |
| Currents carry warm tropical surface waters to the
North Atlantic Ocean. There it becomes colder, denser and sinks to the
ocean bottom. This cold water travels along the ocean bottom for 1000
years until it finally picks up enough heat to rise to the surface in
the Indian Ocean and the North Pacific Ocean. The implication is that
heat absorbed by the oceans today becomes entrained and stored in the
oceans for hundreds of years. This large scale thermal inertia means
that when climate effects finally are recognized, it may take hundreds
of years for countermeasures to produce a result. |
What the models predict
General Circulation Models predict that the north polar regions will
experience the fastest warming
 |
| Global temperature changes for CO2 doubled world.
General Circulation Model of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial
Research Organization (CSIRS), Australia. |
 |
| Global Climate Simulation Models predict substantial
melting of Artic ice this century -- as a result of a warming planet.
Ice melt from Greenland could produce significant sea level rise. |
General Circulation Models predict that some areas will become
wetter, other areas will become drier
 |
| Annual precipitation change results for a CO2-doubled
world, by the General Fluid Dynamics Laboratory GCM. A value of 1.0
means no change. Values above 1.0 mean increases. Values below 1.0 mean
decreases. |
General Circulation Models predict that some areas will experience more
warming than others
 |
| Annual temperature changes in a CO2-doubled world,
by the General Fluid Dynamics Laboratory GCM. |
Global warming could transform the distribution of ecosystems
 |
| General circulation models predict drier conditions for
places that now are rainy. In the tropics, this result could
significantly reduce the size of rain forests, especially in
west Africa. |
Rising sea levels could threaten and destroy coastal environments
 |
| Storm surf crashes into a coastal community. Modest rises in
sea level pose little threat under calm conditions. But higher
sea levels will allow severe storms to push deeper into coastal
environments. |
Global warming will disrupt current patterns of food production

Current location of the grain belt.

Predicted migration of the grain belt north as a result of
global warming. |
| Global warming could cause centers of food production to
shift. Local and regional economies could experience substantial
instabilities. |
Global warming could increase the spread of warm-weather disease
 |
| Shifting climate zones could be accompanied by their
resident diseases, infesting new frontiers. |
 |
| Malaria-spreading mosquito |
Isn't there any GOOD news about the effects of air pollution?
Sulfate aerosol pollution above industrial cities has a cooling
effect
 |
| Areas that receive less solar radiation due to the
presence of high concentrations of sulfate aerosols in the atmosphere.
Sulfate aerosols are produced above urbanized areas where large amounts
of fossil fuels are burned. The presence of these aerosols has a cooling
effect that , to a certain degree, counteracts the warming effects of
fossil fuel emissions. Too bad sulfate aerosols are toxic... |
|